There can be no doubt that the entire educational system is in a crisis. There are not enough resources. Teachers have to deal with very large classes and they often have to deal with disciplinary problems. The administrative load is heavy and they have to show support for extra curricular activities. This is all apart from their primary jobs, to teach. Luckily, with school based instructional rounds teachers get a chance to learn and to become better in their jobs.
Implementing such a system is easy and it does not require any form of funding. It is not a complicated system. Small groups of teachers visit a colleague to observe him presenting a lesson. This teacher under observation is normally a well respected and experienced educator known for achieving excellent results. The purpose of the observers is to learn from him. The system is always voluntary.
Prior to every session, the observers meet in order to set a few objectives for the forthcoming session. These objectives normally focus on the known strong points of the teacher that will be observed. The teacher being observed may be known for his ability to get learners to participate in class activities, for example. The observers will then focus on the methods he uses to achieve this.
Some people confuse these observation sessions with evaluation exercises. This is most certainly not the case. The teacher under observation is not evaluated in any way. The only purpose of the session is to allow the observers the opportunity to see a respected colleague in action. This is made clear to all role players, including the learners. No feedback is given.
After each session, the observers meet once more. The purpose of this second meeting is to share their experiences and to tell each other what they have learned during the session. No criticism in any form is allowed and no report is compiled. Observers rather focus on ways in which they can implement the lessons that they have learned in their own classrooms. These meetings are deemed to be strictly confidential.
Most teachers that participate in these systems are extremely positive about it. They say that they really do learn from their colleagues and that they appreciate the opportunity to get to know their own colleagues a bit better. Teacher being observed also benefit because they enjoy the official recognition of their peers. The entire concept has grown in popularity and is now even used by some universities and colleges.
The critics are sceptical. They think that there is little benefit to be gained in short observation sessions and that the entire systems is much too informal. In addition, they accuse teachers being observed of taking special trouble to make a good impression upon their colleagues. Formal training is the only true answer to the problem of poor educational standards, these critics allege.
Regardless of thee criticism, observation sessions keep growing in popularity. It is easy to implement and it does not cost money. The majority of role players agree that any effort to improve the standard of education should be applauded and supported.
Implementing such a system is easy and it does not require any form of funding. It is not a complicated system. Small groups of teachers visit a colleague to observe him presenting a lesson. This teacher under observation is normally a well respected and experienced educator known for achieving excellent results. The purpose of the observers is to learn from him. The system is always voluntary.
Prior to every session, the observers meet in order to set a few objectives for the forthcoming session. These objectives normally focus on the known strong points of the teacher that will be observed. The teacher being observed may be known for his ability to get learners to participate in class activities, for example. The observers will then focus on the methods he uses to achieve this.
Some people confuse these observation sessions with evaluation exercises. This is most certainly not the case. The teacher under observation is not evaluated in any way. The only purpose of the session is to allow the observers the opportunity to see a respected colleague in action. This is made clear to all role players, including the learners. No feedback is given.
After each session, the observers meet once more. The purpose of this second meeting is to share their experiences and to tell each other what they have learned during the session. No criticism in any form is allowed and no report is compiled. Observers rather focus on ways in which they can implement the lessons that they have learned in their own classrooms. These meetings are deemed to be strictly confidential.
Most teachers that participate in these systems are extremely positive about it. They say that they really do learn from their colleagues and that they appreciate the opportunity to get to know their own colleagues a bit better. Teacher being observed also benefit because they enjoy the official recognition of their peers. The entire concept has grown in popularity and is now even used by some universities and colleges.
The critics are sceptical. They think that there is little benefit to be gained in short observation sessions and that the entire systems is much too informal. In addition, they accuse teachers being observed of taking special trouble to make a good impression upon their colleagues. Formal training is the only true answer to the problem of poor educational standards, these critics allege.
Regardless of thee criticism, observation sessions keep growing in popularity. It is easy to implement and it does not cost money. The majority of role players agree that any effort to improve the standard of education should be applauded and supported.
About the Author:
When you are searching for information about school based instructional rounds, come to our web pages today. More details are available at http://www.instructionalrounds.com/WhatIsIR.html now.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire